Photobucket

Source: Daily Mail

Speed cameras which communicate with each other by satellite are being secretly tested on British roads.

The hi-tech devices can follow drivers’ progress for miles to calculate whether they have broken speed limits.

Combining number plate recognition technology with global positioning satellites, they can be set up in a network to monitor tens of thousands of cars over huge areas for the smallest breach.

Known as SpeedSpike, the system uses similar methods of recognition as the cameras which enforce the congestion charge in London, and allow two cameras to ‘talk’ to each other if a vehicle appears to have travelled too far in too short a space of time.

After a covert national trial which has not been publicised until now, just days after a report showed motorists have been fined almost £1billion in speeding tickets under Labour, authorities hope the new cameras will enable them to re-create the system used on motorway contraflows.

The Home Office is currently testing them at two sites – one in Southwark in London and another on the A374 between Antony and Torpoint in Cornwall.

Details of the secret trials emerged in a House of Commons report and immediately attracted criticism.

Conservative MP Geoffrey Cox, whose Devon constituency is close to the Cornish test site, said fundamental questions had to be addressed before such an ‘alarming’ level of surveillance was extended.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1267278/Motorists-spied-filmed-police-carry-secret-trial-new-high-tech-speed-camera.html#ixzz0leR14j00

Print

Source: RawStory

Lawsuit: School administrator ‘may be a voyeur’ who spied on kids for personal gratification

A Philadelphia-area school district secretly took “thousands” of webcam photos of students in their homes and tracked their Web site visits and parts of online chats through spy software installed on the students’ school-issued laptops, a Pennsylvania court heard yesterday.

In February, the family of Blake Robbins, a student at Harriton High School in Rosemont, sued the Lower Merion School District after the district admitted to them it had been spying on students via a remote-activated feature on the laptops it issued to all its 2,300 high school pupils.

In a motion filed in court on Thursday, Robbins’ lawyers asserted that the school district had taken at least 400 snapshots of 15-year-old Robbins, including some of him sleeping. The motion also stated that the school district took “thousands of webcam pictures and screen shots have been taken of numerous other students in their homes,” the Philadelphia Inquirer reports.

And in a strange twist to the story, the lawyers also suggested that Carol Cafiero, one of two school administrators with access to the spying technology, “may be a voyeur” who spied on students for her personal gratification, as some of the images taken by the laptops may have ended up on her personal computer.

The motion asks the judge to force Cafiero to turn over her home computer, which she has refused to do so far. Earlier this week, during a deposition, Cafiero pleaded the Fifth Amendment to all questions regarding her involvement in the alleged school spying.

Watching the students at home was like “a little [Lower Merion School District] soap opera,” said a staffer in an email obtained by Robbins’ lawyers.

“I know, I love it,” Cafiero responded in a reply email, as quoted at the Inquirer.

If true, the allegations against Cafiero would realize privacy advocates’ worst fears about the school district’s monitoring of students at home: That the technology is all too open to abuse by those who would seek to exploit children.

So far, there have been no allegations that the cameras captured any images of nude students, which could fall within the definition of child pornography.

On Thursday, the judge presiding over the case in a federal courtroom in Philadelphia restricted access to the images to the lawyers involved in the case, reports KYW news radio. The school board says it will soon notify the parents of children whose pictures were taken by the spy software, and is working on a way to transfer the photos to the parents, the Inquirer reported Friday.

The latest claims made against the school district contradict what the district itself has said about the use of the cameras. In February, when news of the spy software broke, the school district published a statement saying administrators had activated the monitoring system only 42 times, most of those in order to retrieve lost or stolen laptops.

But the allegations made Thursday suggest “there were 42 instances when they began intensive surveillance on the suspected stolen computers,” reports tech blog Slashdot. “This consisted of (among other things) transmitting a picture from the laptop’s webcam every 15 minutes. This may have gone on for weeks.”

The school district announced in February it was shutting down the spy software, shortly after news of the spy software went public.

Robbins’ family launched the lawsuit two months ago after Blake Robbins was called into a vice-principal’s office and accused of taking drugs. As evidence, the vice-principal showed a photo of pills in Robbins’ bedroom. The Robbins family said the pills were candy, and launched a class-action lawsuit alleging the school district violated Blake’s right to privacy.

This week, Sen. Arlen Specter (D-PA), who held hearings into the Lower Merion School District’s spying activities, introduced legislation limiting the use of surveillance software.

The proposed Surreptitious Video Surveillance Act of 2010 “would update the federal wiretapping statute to create serious criminal and civil penalties for secret, nonconsensual video surveillance inside any temporary or permanent residence, be it your house, your apartment, or your hotel room,” reports the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Print
Smile straphangers — you’re on candid camera!

A notice warns E train riders of the new subway security cameras.

……
..
..
Four cars of an E train equipped with state-of-the-art security cameras made its unprecedented first run this morning, part of an aggressive anti-terror and crime initiative that the MTA could expand to every line in the subway system.
Riders in the super-secure cars will see a sticker that reads: “Notice: This train may be equipped with a video recording device.”
The train will make four runs today — from Jamaica Center to the World Trade Center –two in the morning hours and two in the afternoon.
The cameras won’t be watched live, but will be digitally taped and stored and used in investigations and criminal prosecutions.
Also installed in the same cars are “fold-up” subway seats, which transit officials may use in the future to squeeze 18 percent more riders into subway cars during rush hour.
Vertical bars on those cars will be closer to the windows, instead of pushed toward the center. Also, metal grasps — hearkening back to the hanging straps — will be placed on the cross-bar above the seats.
There’s no timeline when the seats will be “unlocked” and put into use.
As for the cameras, transit officials said alerting riders to their mere presence can reduce crime and aid in fighting terror.
“Video camera systems have clearly been shown to help deter criminal activity on transit vehicles,” said new subway and bus chief Thomas Prendergast.
He added that the cameras are invaluable when it comes to investigating the “potential threat of terrorist activity” on the subway.
If a straphanger is assaulted — heaven forbid — he or she can report the incident to the NYPD and police can then use the video feed in the investigation.
Each car will be equipped with four cameras, for a total of 16. The system was manufactured and installed by California-based TOA Corp. with little to no cost to the MTA.
“The cameras will be conspicuously installed in the train,” said a NYCT source. “It’ll provide us with forensic evidence.”
There will be a 12-month evaluation process, and then a final decision on their use will be made in 2011.
Officials will look at video quality and after “evaluation of the system, NYC Transit may consider implementing the closed-circuit television system throughout the subway fleet,” said Steven Feil, senior vice president for the department of subways.
Straphangers welcomed the watchful eye, saying criminals were less likely to strike if they know they’re being recorded.
“It’ll protect people. It’ll bring down a lot of unwanted activities on the train,” said Donald Terrell, 48, from Harlem.
“A lot of people in New York see something but they don’t say anything,” he added.
Several female riders said the cameras will give them peace of mind during late-night commutes.
“There are a lot of perverts out there, and if cops aren’t around now you’ll be able to say “run the tape!” said Nicole Davis, 34, a Bronx school bus driver.
MTA board member Norman Seabrook, who chairs the safety and security committee, said he was concerned about people “vandalizing” the cameras.
“I hope we don’t see people spray painting them over,” he said.
Print


© 2010 The Crotch Shot Radio Show Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha